学生给老师打分已很普遍

　　人们对其持不同态度

　　我的看法

　　【范文】

　　Students’ Rating of Their Teachers

　　Nowadays, it has become as common in colleges and universities for students to grade teachers as for teachers to grade students. In some universities students’ rating has even become the only source of information on teaching effectiveness.

　　This, however, has caused great controversy. Some are in favor of the rating system. They hold that since students attend the teachers’ classes everyday, they should have their opinion about their teachers’ effectiveness. Others, on the contrary, are strongly against it. They believe that there is much more to teaching than what is shown on students’ rating forms. Students should not be expected to judge whether the materials used are up to date or how well the teacher knows about the subject. These judgments require professional knowledge, which is best left for the teachers’ colleagues.

　　I think students’ rating of their teachers is necessary, but it should be conducted in a way that can really shed meaningful light on teachers’ performance. Instead of rating the teachers’ knowledge on the subject, students should be asked to estimate what they themselves have leaned in a course, and to report on such things as a teacher’s ability to communicate with students, his relationship with students, and his ability to arouse interest in the subject.

　　学生给老师打分

　　现在的大学校园里学生给老师打分已经跟老师给学生打分一样普遍了。在有些学校学生给老师打的分数甚至成为了老师的教学质量的唯一信息来源。

　　然而这个情况引发了不少争论。有些人支持这种打分体系。他们认为既然学生每天都要上这些老师的课，他们就应该对该老师的教学质量持有观点。相反地，其他人强烈反对这个体系。他们相信老师的教学内容比学生手中的打分表要多得多。不应该指望学生可以评价课堂上使用的教材是否是最新的或者这名老师对该课程有多熟悉。评价这些方面需要专业知识，所以最好留给老师的同事们来评。

　　我认为学生给老师打分是必要的，但应该通过一种真正有意义的、可以让老师的教学水平更能被这是反应的方式来进行。不应该对老师在该课程上拥有的知识量打分，而应该让学生们自己评价他们在这堂课上学到了什么，并且评价该老师同学生沟通的能力、ta和学生的关系，以及在课堂上激发学生关于该课程的兴趣的能力。